![]() ![]() I like Blizzard because, well, it has the keys to the castle. I like Swifty because he brings a fun angle to the game I play. The Swifty controversy, if you can call it that, is an exercise in the temperament of community reaction. To be fair, Black War Bear runs can crash servers, and it is a common understanding that orchestrating server crash events is a definite no-no in Blizzard's eyes. It is quite clear from Swifty's history with World of Warcraft that he wouldn't have wanted to intentionally cause mayhem (on the scale that happened, anyway) and that his intentions were pure, if unknowingly misguided. We took our time putting out this story because, frankly, we wanted to see where it would go. I've edited the original post to hopefully avoid similar confusion moving forward. #John swifty pyle full#That was not done for some of the accounts that initially received a full ban, so we corrected the initial mistake and reduced the ban for those accounts to a suspension.įor those concerned with this particular issue, I hope this clarifies things somewhat. ![]() However, we tend to base the degree of disciplinary action on the evidence we have indicating to what degree the account in question is involved. The key words are "based on the evidence," not "based on the activity." The activity of intentionally trying to crash a realm is exceptionally ban-worthy, and we won't hesitate to permanently ban accounts that are involved in that kind of malicious behavior. We reviewed the activity and felt that based on the evidence, the original decision to roll out the ban hammer was incorrect, and the appropriate action, for those bans that were undone, would have been to issue a suspension. Just to clarify, the decision to change some of the bans to suspensions was actually a correction, not an exception. It looks like there's some confusion regarding our original message - in large part due to some poor word choice. Have fun and please remember to play responsibly. Related discussions outside of this thread will be locked, deleted, and/or fed to Murlocs. Please keep discussions related to this action within this thread. While an exception was made in this case, accountholders who intentionally participate in events that contribute to realm instability will be subject to significant account actions, up to and including a permanent vacation from the game. We're dedicated to providing a fun, stable, reliable gameplay environment for our players. We're currently in the process of identifying all offenders who acted to purposefully disrupt game service and will administer proper action to each participating account. ![]() Upon further review, we have made the determination to reduce some of these permanent bans to temporary suspensions. In some cases, individual players spammed an emote upwards of 30,000 times.Īs a result, some accounts found to be active participants in this activity were permanently banned. We recently monitored a situation where a large number of players intentionally disrupted access to multiple realms by gathering together and mass-spamming game emotes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |